Talk:Dig a Pony

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Dig a Pony article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

The Beatles Low‑importance

This Beatles-related article is within the scope of WikiProject The Beatles, which focuses on improving coverage of English rock band The Beatles and related topics on Wikipedia. Users who are willing to participate in the project should visit the project page, where they can join and see a list of open tasks.The BeatlesWikipedia:WikiProject The BeatlesTemplate:WikiProject The BeatlesThe Beatles articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to songs on Wikipedia.

To-do list:

For WikiProject The Beatles

A list of articles needing cleanup associated with this project is available. See also the tool's wiki page and the index of WikiProjects.

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Articles on each Beatle tour (Category:The Beatles concert tours). See: Missing articles.
Expand : The Lost Lennon Tapes, notable radio series which has spawned many bootlegs. Apple Records See also: Adopt an article
Stubs : See: Category:The Beatles song stubs
Update : Pics/Graphics wanted: Kenwood.
Verify : Beatle wives
Other : Project: Add {{WikiProject The Beatles}} to the talk pages of all Beatles-related articles. Send a newsletter to members, canvas for new members and coordinate tasks. Enter articles assessed as stubs onto this list, also list articles needing cleanup and other work here.

This article does not yet have a related to do list. If you can think of any ways to improve the article, why not create one?

Untitled

This is the greatest beatles song ever 71.127.222.180 00:39, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Stub?

Is this article really a stub? It seems good in length and information to me. Democraticmacguitarist (talk) 11:39, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It was a stub in August 2006 when Kingbotk did the above assessment. At that stage the article looked like this though. This article's been tagged as a stub since 2005. I'd tend to agree with you though, it's got beyond the "stub" stage. WP:STUB suggests that if you feel this way about an article, you shouldn't be afraid to remove its stub tag, so I'll do that now. -- Bobyllib (talk) 16:40, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank you, I'll make note of that in the future. Democraticmacguitarist (talk) 20:37, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ringo may have been blowing his nose

This article doesn't source the claim about Ringo putting down a cigarette during the song's false start. The about.com site says he is seen blowing his nose during that part in the Let it Be film. I haven't seen it yet, but that sounds quite credible as I distinctly recall the sound of air being forced briskly at that point in the song. I always assumed one of them stopped to smoke something or other, but I guess the film might show the real story.... Ender and Peter 15:21, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

So, I finally saw the Let it Be movie and from what I can tell, Ringo does indeed appear to be putting down a cigarette. It's hard to tell what his precise movements are because the drum set blocks some of the view. Immediately before the false start, you do see him bringing his arm down with the cigarette in hand. But right after he says "Hold it!", you can very briefly see that he is still holding on to the cigarette and is only now taking a few seconds to put it out. On the album, there is what I thought was a swift breathing sound, but it could be the sound of him putting it out. This is followed by a very audible sigh of relief, which sounds like it's still coming from Ringo. You can then hear someone mocking Ringo's interruption followed by Harrison counting off again. This is my best determination of what's going on. It does not look like Ringo is blowing his nose, contrary to the about.com article. Ender and Peter 04:57, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm rewatching the roof performance as it is on the newest Peter Jackson's Get Back documentary and I can clearly see that Ringo starts smoking a cigarrete in between Get Back (take 2) and Don't Let Me Down while his bandmates are running instruments and quickly puts it down before they start. Later on George and John share a cigarette between I've Got a Feeling and One After 909. One songs later Ringo has a new non lighted one on his mouth while Lennon asks for someone to bring him the Lyrics for Dig A Pony (relevant timestamp is 1:47:00 of episode 3). While Lennon gets Kevin to hold the papers for him, Ringo starts to smoke while Preston rehearses a bit in the background. Ringo and George join in the rehearsal for a while. When the real take is ready to roll Paul is giving one last rehearsal for the starting bass line and John is playing some chords while glancing at the scribbled lyrics in front of him, right as the cinematographer tells them they are ready to start. Ringo gives his cigarette one quick last smoke but Paul counts to three right as he's placing it down on the roof's floor, both sticks on his right hand and unprepared to play. He shouts "Hold it!" at the same time Paul has already played the first note on his count to three. Lennon glances back to see why Ringo stopped the start and as he gets ready to restart he sniffles a bit (we can see he was freezing a bit on that roof through the performance, trying to warm his hands as best as he could).

Mystery of the false start solved. ProfesorRod (talk) 01:54, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Intro Riff

Did anyone else notice that on the mix of the song on Let It Be...Naked, they just copied the intro riff from another part of the song and pasted over the more tacky intro riff found on the mix released on Let It Be?

No doubt I prefer the naked mix over the album one. C.Syde (talk | contribs) 08:01, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pls add St. Vincent Cover of this

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lan-UQfN0zs — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.175.225.206 (talk) 01:39, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dig a Pony. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100131010312/http://mixonline.com/recording/interviews/audio_naked_truth_beatles/ to http://mixonline.com/recording/interviews/audio_naked_truth_beatles/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:29, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Is it really in 3/4 time?

Normal 3/4 time has 3 beats in a measure, each of which can further subdivided into 4 beats.

Here each of the 3 beats can be subdivided into 3 beats, not 4. This would typically be considered 9/8 time. Given how fast those 9 beats are, and how any reasonable person would transcribe it, maybe you end up in 9/16? But that seems ridiculous.

Maybe the less ridiculous approach is to say the song is in a compound time based on 3/4, which is less informative but correct, probably sufficient, and a lighter touch to current text. 144.92.154.84 (talk) 16:52, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

We have to rely on reliable sources. Currently it's sourced to Ian MacDonald, an authority on the Beatles. Do you have a reliable source that contradicts MacDonald? Sundayclose (talk) 17:42, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]